When the Roman armies returned from these many victorious campaigns, they were received with great jubilation. Alas and alack! this sudden glory did not make the country any happier. On the contrary. The endless campaigns had ruined the farmers who had been obliged to do the hard work of Empire making. It had placed too much power in the hands of the successful generals (and their private friends) who had used the war as an excuse for wholesale robbery.

The old Roman Republic had been proud of the simplicity which had characterized the lives of her famous men. The new Republic felt ashamed of the shabby coats and the high principles which had been fashionable in the days of its grandfathers. It became a land of rich people ruled by rich people for the benefit of rich people. As such it was doomed to disastrous failure, as I shall now tell you.

Within less than a century and a half. Rome had become the mistress of practically all the land around the Mediterranean. In those early days of history, a prisoner of war lost their freedom and became a slave. The Roman regarded war as a very serious business and he showed no mercy to a conquered foe. After the fall of Carthage, the Carthaginian women and children were sold into bondage together with their own slaves. And a like fate awaited the obstinate inhabitants of Greece and Macedonia and Spain and Syria when they dared to revolt against the Roman power.

Two thousand years ago a slave was considered merely a piece of machinery. Nowadays a rich person invests their money in factories. The rich people of Rome (senators, generals and war profiteers) invested theirs in land and in slaves. The land they bought or took in the newly-acquired provinces. The slaves they bought in open market wherever they happened to be cheapest. During most of the third and second centuries before Christ there was a plentiful supply, and as a result the landowners worked their slaves until they dropped dead in their tracks, when they bought new ones at the nearest bargain-counter of Corinthian or Carthaginian captives.

And now behold the fate of the freeborn farmer!

He had done his duty toward Rome and he had fought her battles without complaint. But when he came home after ten, fifteen or twenty years, his lands were covered with weeds and his family had been ruined. But he was a strong man and willing to begin life anew. He sowed and planted and waited for the harvest. He carried his grain to the market together with his cattle and his poultry, to find that the large landowners who worked their estates with slaves could underbid him all along the line. For a couple of years, he tried to hold his own. Then he gave up in despair. He left the country and he went to the nearest city. In the city he was as hungry as he had been before on the land. But he shared his misery with thousands of other disinherited beings. They crouched together in filthy hovels in the suburbs of the large cities. They were apt to get sick and die from terrible epidemics. They were all profoundly discontented. They had fought for their country and this was their reward. They were always willing to listen to those plausible spell-binders who gather around a public grievance like so many hungry vultures, and soon they became a grave menace to the safety of the state.

But the class of the newly-rich shrugged its shoulders. "We have our army and our policemen," they argued, "they will keep the mob in order." And they hid themselves behind the high walls of their pleasant villas and cultivated their gardens and read the poems of a certain Homer which a Greek slave had just translated into very pleasing Latin hexameters.

In a few families however the old tradition of unselfish service to the Commonwealth continued. Cornelia, the daughter of Scipio Africanus, had been married to a Roman by the name of Gracchus. She had two sons, Tiberius and Gaius. When the boys grew up they entered politics and tried to bring about certain much-needed reforms. A census had shown that most of the land of the Italian peninsula was owned by two thousand noble families. Tiberius Gracchus, having been elected a Tribune, tried to help the freemen. He revived two ancient laws which restricted the number of acres which a single owner might possess. In this way he hoped to revive the valuable old class of small and independent freeholders. The newly-rich called him a robber and an enemy of the state. There were street riots. A party of thugs was hired to kill the popular Tribune. Tiberius Gracchus was attacked when he entered the assembly and was beaten to death. Ten years later his brother Gaius tried the experiment of reforming a nation against the expressed wishes of a strong privileged class. He passed a "poor law" which was meant to help the destitute farmers. Eventually it made the greater part of the Roman citizens into professional beggars.

He established colonies of destitute people in distant parts of the empire, but these settlements failed to attract the right sort of people. Before Gaius Gracchus could do more harm he too was murdered and his followers were either killed or exiled. The first two reformers had been gentlemen. The two who came after were of a very different stamp. They were professional soldiers. One was called Marius. The name of the other was Sulla. Both enjoyed a large personal following.

Sulla was the leader of the landowners. Marius, the victor in a great battle at the foot of the Alps when the Teutons and the Cimbri had been annihilated, was the popular hero of the disinherited freemen.

Now it happened in the year 88 B.C. that the Senate of Rome was greatly disturbed by rumors that came from Asia. Mithridates, king of a country along the shores of the Black Sea, and a Greek on his mother's side, had seen the possibility of establishing a second Alexandrian Empire. He began his campaign for world-domination with the murder of all Roman citizens who happened to be in Asia Minor, men, women and children. Such an act, of course, meant war. The Senate equipped an army to march against the King of Pontus and punish him for his crime. But who was to be commander-in-chief? "Sulla," said the Senate, "because he is Consul." "Marius," said the mob, "because he has been Consul five times and because he is the champion of our rights."

Possession is nine points of the law. Sulla happened to be in actual command of the army. He went west to defeat Mithridates. Marius fled to Africa. There he waited until he heard that Sulla had crossed into Asia. He then returned to Italy, gathered a motley crew of malcontents, marched on Rome and entered the city with his professional highwaymen, spent five days and five nights, slaughtering the enemies of the Senatorial party, got himself elected Consul and promptly died from the excitement of the last fortnight.

There followed four years of disorder. Then Sulla, having defeated Mithridates, announced that he was ready to return to Rome and settle a few old scores of his own. He was as good as his word. For weeks his soldiers were busy executing those of their fellow citizens who were suspected of democratic sympathies. One day they got hold of a young fellow who had been often seen in the company of Marius. They were going to hang him when someone interfered. "The boy is too young," he said, and they let him go. His name was Julius Caesar. You shall meet him again in the next lesson.

Directions

Study the lesson for one week.

Over the week:

  • Read and/or listen to the story.
  • Review the synopsis.
  • Study the vocabulary terms.
  • Complete the enrichment activities.
  • Answer the review questions.

Synopsis

As the Roman Empire expanded to encompass the lands encircling the Mediterranean, power concentrated in the hands of a small number of unprincipled rich generals, politicians, and war profiteers. The other people of the Roman Empire became unhappy. The people of the lands conquered by the Romans, including women and children, were sold into slavery. The rich invested heavily into buying land and slaves, working the slaves until they died. The freeborn farmers, back from the war to farm their small plots of land, could not compete with the rich landowners. Some politicians advocated for better lives for the farmers, but the rich fought back, hiring thugs to intimidate and kill. Intent on reform, Sulla and Marius, two Roman military leaders marched upon Rome.

Vocabulary

Principle: A guiding belief or moral rule.
Prisoner of War: A soldier or combatant who is captured by the enemy.
Bondage: The state of being enslaved.
War Profiteers: A person or group that gains a significant amount of revenue from selling weapons and military equipment.
Freeborn: Born free rather than in bondage or as a slave.
Reformer: One who works to change of something that is defective, broken, inefficient, or otherwise negative, in order to correct or improve it.

Enrichment

Activity 1: Narrate the Lesson

  • After you read or listen to the lesson, narrate the events aloud using your own words.

Activity 2: Study the Story Picture

  • Study the story picture, 'Caius Marius Amid the Ruins of Carthage,' by John Vanderlyn and describe how it relates to the story.

Activity 3: Map the Story

  • The top map highlights the greatest extent of the Roman Empire. Find Italy and Rome.
  • List as many of today's countries as you can that once were part of the Roman Empire.

Activity 4: Complete Copywork, Narration, Dictation, and Art   

Click the crayon above. Complete pages 55-56 of 'World History Copywork, Narration, Dictation, and Art for Third Grade.'

Review

Question 1

Although Rome garnered great military victories, why were many Romans unhappy?
1 / 3

Answer 1

Power concentrated in the hands of a small number of rich people. Conquered people were enslaved. Freeborn farmers could not compete with the rich landowners.
1 / 3

Question 2

What happened when some politicians pushed reform policies to benefit the freeborn farmers?
2 / 3

Answer 2

The rich fought back, hiring thugs to intimidate and kill the politicians.
2 / 3

Question 3

What tactics did Sulla and Marius, two Roman military leaders, use to try to reform Rome?
3 / 3

Answer 3

The two former military leaders unsurprisingly used military tactics, marching upon Rome and slaughtering other Romans.
3 / 3

  1. Although Rome garnered great military victories, why were many Romans unhappy? Power concentrated in the hands of a small number of rich people. Conquered people were enslaved. Freeborn farmers could not compete with the rich landowners.
  2. What happened when some politicians pushed reform policies to benefit the freeborn farmers? The rich fought back, hiring thugs to intimidate and kill the politicians.
  3. What tactics did Sulla and Marius, two Roman military leaders, use to try to reform Rome? The two former military leaders unsurprisingly used military tactics, marching upon Rome and slaughtering other Romans.

References

  1. 'Caius Marius Amid the Ruins of Carthage by John Vanderlyn. (1807, {PD-old-auto-1923})' Wikipedia. commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:John_Vanderlyn_-_Caius_Marius_Amid_the_Ruins_of_Carthage_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg. n.p.
  2. 'The Roman Empire at its greatest extent published by J.M. Dent and Sons Ltd. (1907, {PD-old-auto-1923})' Wikipedia. commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Roman_Empire_full_map.jpg. n.p.